Hydralazine vs labetalol

labetalol. hydralazine increases effects of labetalol by pharmacodynamic synergism. Use Caution/Monitor. Additive hypotensive effects. lemborexant. hydralazine

Those who initially received nifedipine had a shorter mean time to resolution of severe hypertension (32.6 minutes vs 46.3 for hydralazine and 50.3 for labetalol; P .01) and were more likely to have resolution of severe hypertension within 60 minutes (91.0% vs 77.9% for hydralazine and 76.8% for labetalol; P .01). Nifedipine also resulted in a

Headache was significantly more frequent in patients given hydralazine than following Labetalol use. The difference was statistically significant (25.4% vs. 3.2

Intravenous Labetalol, Hydralazine, Sodium Nitroprusside or Nitroglycerine A comparison of no medication versus methyldopa or labetalol in chronic

1: Flow chart of randomized trial of nefidipine vs labetalol are oral nifedipine, intravenous labetalol and hydralazine.13.

by R Hjertberg 2024 Cited by 27Article Neonatal adaptation in hypertensive pregnancyA study of labetalol vs hydralazine treatment was published on January 1

Hydralazine vs labetalol for the treatment of severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A randomized, controlled trial. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2024;4(1):19

Hydralazine Vs Labetalol in Mean Reduction of Mean Arterial Pressure in patients with Severe Preeclampsia. A Naz, Z Jawad. Pakistan journal of medical and

A total of 573 doses of PRN IV or oral hydralazine or labetalol were administered to the 250 patients. Oral hydralazine was the most commonly administered antihypertensive agent at 90.9% of doses compared with IV hydralazine at 5.4%, oral labetalol at 3.0%, and IV labetalol at only 0.7% of doses.